Antitrust Lawsuit | Media & Entertainment | Business

Introduction: A Conservative Clash in Court

In a bold legal move, conservative media outlet Newsmax filed an antitrust lawsuit on September 3, 2025, accusing Fox News and its parent company, Fox Corporation, of engaging in unlawful monopolistic behavior to suppress competition in the market for right-leaning pay-TV news. The lawsuit was lodged in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, marking a rare legal clash between two prominent conservative networks.(The Washington Post, AP News, Reuters)

Allegations at a Glance

According to Newsmax, Fox News exploited its dominant position in the market through a series of exclusionary and coercive tactics:

• Carriage Manipulation: Fox allegedly pressured distributors to not carry, or to downgrade, competing networks like Newsmax and One America News.(The Washington Post, The Guardian, Politico)
• Excessive Fees & Bundling: The network is accused of charging “outsized” carriage fees and tying Newsmax’s inclusion to distributors carrying less popular Fox channels.(AP News, The Daily Beast, Newsmax, CNBC)
• Smear Campaigns & Intimidation: The complaint alleges that Fox hired private investigators to probe Newsmax executives, blocked guests from appearing on Newsmax, and deployed third-party actors to conduct social media attacks against Newsmax CEO Christopher Ruddy.(AP News, Politico, Newsmax, The Daily Beast)
• Internal Communications Evidence: Newsmax references internal Fox documents—obtained during prior litigation—that show executives were deeply concerned about Newsmax’s rising audience following the 2020 U.S. election.(The Washington Post, Newsmax)

Newsmax asserts that without Fox’s anticompetitive practices, it would have achieved broader cable distribution, higher ratings, and stronger advertiser interest.(The Washington Post, CNBC)

Legal Strategy and Claims

Newsmax’s complaint invokes Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, along with the Florida Antitrust Act and the Florida Deceptive & Unfair Trade Practices Act. It seeks:

• A permanent injunction to halt Fox’s allegedly exclusionary agreements
• Treble damages, along with attorney fees, as permitted under federal antitrust law(Newsmax, National Law Review)

The case is expected to involve a discovery phase that may unearth sensitive contractual details from Fox, shedding light on the hidden mechanics of the cable news distribution business.(The Washington Post, Reuters)

Responses and Broader Context

Fox News has publicly dismissed the lawsuit, claiming that Newsmax is using litigation to distract from its own market failings.(The Washington Post, AP News, The Daily Beast)

The lawsuit arrives amid a broader wave of legal challenges facing Fox’s media empire, including defamation settlements with Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic. Newsmax asserts that its own legal path is about restoring fairness and expanding viewer choice in conservative media.(The Guardian, Reuters, Newsmax, The Daily Beast)

Why It Matters: Insight for Legal and Media Sectors

• Antitrust Enforcement in Media: This case exemplifies how dominant media entities could use leverage and contractual design to stifle competition—not just in pricing, but in editorial diversity.
• Discovery as a Tool: With access to internal communications, the lawsuit could reveal the underpinnings of carriage strategy, market protectionism, and reputational tampering.
• Consumer Impact: Viewers’ choice and access to alternative broadcasting voices may hinge on the outcome. If Fox’s carriage strategies are blocked, streaming platforms like Hulu, Sling, and Fubo could offer broader access to Newsmax.
• Precedent for Media Regulation: A ruling in Newsmax’s favor could set a precedent for challenging similar behavior by other dominant media players across the ideological spectrum.

Conclusion: On Hold For Now

Newsmax’s antitrust suit against Fox News is more than a legal spat—it raises crucial questions about media gatekeeping, competition in ideological markets, and the role of law in preserving consumer choice in the modern broadcasting landscape. As the case moves forward, it’s likely to shape not only the competitive dynamics of right-leaning news, but also broader norms of antitrust enforcement in media industries.

---

Judge Dismisses Newsmax Antitrust Lawsuit Against Fox News—For Now

Key Outcome:
On September 5, 2025, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, presiding in the Southern District of Florida, dismissed Newsmax’s newly filed antitrust lawsuit against Fox News and its parent, Fox Corp. The dismissal, however, was without prejudice, meaning Newsmax has the opportunity to amend and refile the complaint.(Reuters, Wall Street Journal)

Legal Grounds: The “Shotgun Pleading”

• Judge Cannon criticized the complaint as a textbook “shotgun pleading.” This term refers to poorly structured lawsuits where each count repeats all prior allegations, making it difficult for defendants to respond adequately.(Reuters, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg Law, UPI)
• The court emphasized that each count should stand on its own with clear legal and factual underpinnings, and ordered Newsmax to submit a more coherent, organized version by September 11, 2025.(Reuters, TheWrap, dailycaller.com, Bloomberg Law)

Allegations at Issue

While procedural missteps led to dismissal, the lawsuit’s substance remains notable. Newsmax accused Fox News of employing anticompetitive practices to suppress rivals, such as:

• Requiring distributors to prioritize Fox content at the expense of competitors,
• Imposing financial penalties on distributors that carry Newsmax,
• Forcing bundles that include low-demand Fox channels, and
• Blocking Newsmax from being carried on platforms like Hulu, Sling, and Fubo.(The Washington Post, Newsmax, Benzinga)

Reactions from the Parties

• Newsmax framed the dismissal as a technical issue and stated its intention to refile a corrected complaint within the deadline.(Reuters, Wall Street Journal)
• Fox News, meanwhile, dismissed the lawsuit as a poorly disguised attempt by Newsmax to deflect from its own shortcomings in attracting viewers.(Reuters, Wall Street Journal)

Why This Matters

• Procedural standards matter. The swift dismissal underscores how procedural precision—especially in antitrust litigation—can determine whether a case proceeds at all.
• Future implications loom. A refiled complaint will need stronger structure and clarity; its success hinges on whether Newsmax can substantively support its antitrust claims under statutory scrutiny.
• Strategic significance. If allowed to proceed, the case could shine a light on potentially unlawful practices in the conservative media landscape—particularly how dominant networks may use leverage to limit competition.

---

What’s Next?

Newsmax must submit a revised complaint by September 11, 2025, that meets the court’s standards. How Judge Cannon evaluates the new filing will determine whether the case moves forward to discovery or faces further dismissal.