Trademark Law | Business Litigation | Global Trends
Overview: Delivery App Wars
A high-stakes legal conflict has erupted in Brazil’s burgeoning food delivery sector, pitting Chinese ride-hailing giant DiDi Global’s Brazilian arm, 99, against Keeta, a rival platform backed by Chinese tech powerhouse Meituan. The legal dispute underscores intensifying competition—and strategic brinkmanship—as both firms vie for dominance in Latin America’s largest tech market.
Opening Moves: Mutual Lawsuits Ignite
On August 18, 2025, 99 initiated legal action in São Paulo, filing claims of trademark infringement and unfair competition against Keeta. The centerpiece of its complaint is that Keeta’s app mimics the visual identity of 99Food—from colors and fonts to overall graphics—creating confusion and enabling Keeta to capitalize on 99’s brand reputation. The lawsuit seeks a judicial order forcing Keeta to redesign its logo.(Reuters)
The lawsuit followed a retaliatory move by Keeta, which alleged that 99 employed anti-competitive tactics by pressuring restaurant partners to limit their operations to just two delivery platforms.(Reuters)
Legal Issues at Stake
- Trademark Distinctiveness vs. Brand Imitation
99 claims that Keeta’s choice of styling is a calculated effort to “hitch a ride” on its established brand identity, potentially confusing consumers.(Reuters) - Defensive Argument from Keeta
In response, Keeta asserts that its branding has been consistent with Meituan’s color palette and typography for over a decade—and under the Keeta brand for the past three years—suggesting no intent to mislead.(Reuters) - Unfair Competition & Market Behavior
Keeta’s separate claims echo broader competition concerns, spotlighting the high-stakes tactics in Brazil’s food delivery marketplace—where exclusivity deals with restaurants could undercut competition and consumer choice.(Reuters)
Business Context: A Battle for Market Share
- Strategic Market Entry
Meituan’s push into Brazil via Keeta includes a substantial RMB 5.6 billion (USD 1.1 billion) investment over five years. Its aggressive pricing and ultra-low commissions are aimed at dislodging iFood, Brazil’s market leader.(The Rio Times) - Integrated Ecosystem vs. New Challenger
99Food benefits from DiDi’s ride-hailing network and mobile payment infrastructure—an entrenched ecosystem that Meituan seeks to disrupt.(China Daily) - Regulatory & Financial Pressure
The legal tensions emerge amidst a complex Brazilian business environment—marked by regulations like the tax-heavy Programa Remessa Conforme (PRC) and evolving digital governance frameworks including LGPD, akin to Europe’s GDPR.(AInvest)
Broader Legal & Market Implications
| Legal Issue | Potential Impact |
|---|---|
| Trademark Disputes | May define acceptable branding practices for new entrants in Brazil’s delivery market. |
| Anti-Competitive Practices | Could shape what constitutes restrictive agreements across platforms. |
| Regulatory Reach for Foreign Firms | Highlights challenges in cross-border compliance in dynamic digital sectors. |
A court ruling in favor of either side could reshape legal norms for platform branding, contractual exclusivity, and competitive conduct—particularly for foreign tech companies navigating Brazil’s evolving legal landscape.(AInvest)
Looking Ahead
- Court Timeline: The São Paulo court’s processing of the case will be closely watched for swift preliminary decisions, possibly on injunctions or branding mandates.
- Market Consequences: The dispute could alter restaurant partnership agreements, app store advertising, and consumer choice dynamics.
- Investor Watch: Legal outcomes may influence investor confidence in Brazil’s digital market strategies and expected ROI for foreign entrants.
Conclusion: Legal Turf War with Global Implications
What began as a local branding dispute in São Paulo has quickly evolved into a broader legal standoff with implications that reach far beyond Brazil’s food delivery scene. As 99 and Keeta battle in court, their dispute highlights the intersection of intellectual property law, antitrust regulation, and global tech competition—all unfolding in a fast-growing, highly contested market.
Whether the courts rule on trademark infringement, anti-competitive conduct, or both, the decisions will likely ripple across Latin America’s digital economy and influence how foreign tech giants navigate branding, competition, and compliance in emerging markets. For now, Brazil has become ground zero in the global food delivery wars—and this case could well become a landmark precedent in how those battles are legally fought.
Subscribe for Full Access.
